* Nuno Teixeira <[email protected]> [20220915 13:34]: > I can't find an answer for my doubt about if there is a implicit > LICENSE_FILE for LICENSE and this way we could use LICENSE without > LICENSE_FILE?
For some known licenses, there is, see Templates/Licenses. For others,
the framework will just generate a short text telling it's a well-known
license the user would find on the web.
> Should we use LICENSE_FILE whenever LICENSE file(s) exists on ${WRKSRC}?
IMHO, yes. It makes sure to package a full text. Plus there might be
additional remarks to a well-known license that are, even if not legally
relevant, interesting for the user.
Cheers, Felix
--
Felix Palmen <[email protected]> {private} [email protected]
-- ports committer (mentee) -- {web} http://palmen-it.de
{pgp public key} http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt
{pgp fingerprint} 6936 13D5 5BBF 4837 B212 3ACC 54AD E006 9879 F231
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
