On 22 Jan 2023, at 19:38, Robert Huff <[email protected]> wrote: > > This port is EOL from last June ... yet is still required by a > non-trivial nunber of ports (including /.e.g./ apache). > While I understand this is ulitmately up to the individual ports > - is there an effort to replace db5 so it can be removed for good? If > so, who do I talk to?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=261523 -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
