George Mitchell wrote:
It's not so much about methods being "approved" or not, but rather that more and more software (in general) expect isolated and clean build/test environments. No matter the method, you will eventually need to figure out environment isolation for port builds; poudriere simply automates much of the FreeBSD bits. Many threads on these mailing lists stem precisely from not having isolated and clean build environments.On 9/25/23 16:29, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:[...] really not intending to be the wise guy, but if you have any significant number of machines to manage and special package requirements, please by all means run poudriere. It's a marvelous piece of software.We went that way early 2017 and never looked back. [...]I tried it when it was first made available and it caused a crash of the whole system. No doubt it is much better now, but it's also a huge heavyweight operation by my standards, and my unapproved method (update packages when they develop security problems, using partmaster) works well enough for me. -- George
-- Charlie Li ...nope, still don't have an exit line.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
