Bernard Spil wrote on 2023/10/19 02:09: > On 2023-10-18 03:22, Tatsuki Makino wrote: >> By the way, security/openssl111 of origin has been disused once, around >> 2020-01-01. >> And if it is used again, how will PORTEPOCH be treated? > > At no point was anything committed to security/openssl111 that has EPOCH set. > > When security/openssl111 was deleted, it was openssl111-1.1.1d > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/security/openssl111?id=ec9d22cc64ab145058ef25da960430b468b88338 > When it was added it was openssl111-1.1.1w > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/security/openssl111?id=eb45600f807e47956529e5ec3f306539ec798279
Thank you very much. So this time, since it is the same pkgname and the pkgversion is simply increasing, ordering by epoch is not necessary, so it is not done. So, for those who change DEFAULT_VERSIONS from ssl=openssl to ssl=openssl111 and keep 1.1.1, portmaster -o security/openssl111 openssl-1.1.1 would be the best choice, wouldn't it? The method of just rewriting pkgname and origin using pkg-set also seems to allow us to postpone reinstallation until next version upgrade, if we ignore the warning of version decreasing. Regards.
