Hi Cy, On 2024-01-25 17:07, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <[email protected] > om> > , Tom Rushworth writes: [snip] >> >> Which port should I use - sysutils/nut or sysutils/nut-devel ? So far >> the only changes needed are to drivers/Makefile.am and the actual new >> driver source. > > I won't accept a patch for an experimental driver until a pull request to > our upstream has been submitted first, then only to the -devel port. If > they refuse to accept the patch, I will need to remove it from the port as > well. All reasonable. > > Another option may be to add an option for an experimental driver from > which we can fetch your sources from. You'd need to provide a URL. I'm not > prepared to add the patch cart blanche because if it breaks I'm not > prepared to diagnose and debug it for you. Too much work for something there might be no-one else using. There can't be too many CFR1500's out there, and even fewer in the FreeBSD world :). > > Preferred is an upstream pull request. Their URL is > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut. I'll go that route. > > BTW, I found the problematic postfix rule and have fixed it. Sorry about > the bother. It wasn't a bother, I'm the one asking for stuff after all.
This message will work as a test :) > > > -- > Cheers, > Cy Schubert <[email protected]> > FreeBSD UNIX: <[email protected]> Web: https://FreeBSD.org > NTP: <[email protected]> Web: https://nwtime.org > > e^(i*pi)+1=0 > > > Thanks for your time! -- Tom Rushworth
