On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 09:52:30AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Le 30 avril 2024 23:30:16 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger > <[email protected]> a écrit : > >Am 2024-04-30 23:11, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > >> Le 30 avril 2024 22:51:19 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger > >> <[email protected]> a écrit : > >>> Am 2024-04-30 22:21, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > >>>> Le 30 avril 2024 13:18:41 GMT+02:00, Alexander Leidinger > >>>> <[email protected]> a écrit : > >>> > >>>>> Does this sound like "pkg check -B" would help here? > >>>>> > >>>>> Bye, > >>>>> Alexander. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Not at all! I need the output of pkg info -R --raw-format ucl abseil > >>> > >>> Output attached. > >>> > >>>> This is a real issue on your system, which usually comes from local > >>>> building, is it your case? > >>> > >>> It is my own build with poudriere-devel on another system, not build form > >>> ports on the system where the package was installed. The main differences > >>> to the official FreeBSD packages are WITH_PIE, WITH_BIND_NOW and > >>> WITH_RELRO (at least for abseil, some other ports may have some options > >>> like WITHOUT_X11). > >>> > >>> Bye, > >>> Alexander. > >>> > >> > >> So pkg is right your package does not provide anymore the libraries mosh > >> requires! > >> > >> libabsl_strings is not in the provides. > > > >On the poudriere builder: > ># tar -tvf > >/space/poudriere/data/packages/poudriere-bastille-default/All/abseil-20230125.3.pkg > > | grep libabsl_strings > >lrwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 0 10 Apr. 00:22 > >/usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings.so -> libabsl_strings.so.2301.0.0 > >-rwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 99600 10 Apr. 00:22 > >/usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings.so.2301.0.0 > >lrwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 0 10 Apr. 00:22 > >/usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings_internal.so -> > >libabsl_strings_internal.so.2301.0.0 > >-rwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 9536 10 Apr. 00:22 > >/usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings_internal.so.2301.0.0 > > > >Bye, > >Alexander. > > > > > The thing it means it is that some of the .so files from devel/abseil are not > generated in a way that prevents pkg from extracting the SONAME properly > which has a big change to come from one of your non default option (unrelated > to x11 because the port has no x11 option) > > So it highlights a real problem
Note that DT_SONAME is optional. If soname is identical to the file name, it is not needed.
