> On Sep 24, 2024, at 07:56, Matthias Fechner <[email protected]> wrote: > > you are aware, that dhcpd is EOL since end of 2022: > https://www.isc.org/dhcp/ > > and was replaced by kea? > > Not sure if it makes sense to put much effort into it. The upstream being EOL’d doesn’t, IMO, affect the support we have in ports. Unless we’re EOL’ing the port, then we should fix the problem in our script that we install with the port. - Chris
- isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Chris Ross
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Tatsuki Makino
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Chris Ross
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Chris Ross
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Matthias Fechner
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Chris Ross
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Yasuhiro Kimura
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Chris Ross
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Tatsuki Makino
- Re: isc-dhcpd rc.d failure Zach Leslie
