No objection, seems like a good/necessary idea :) Best regards, MMokhi.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 15:20 Ronald Klop <[email protected]> wrote: > If this email keeps coming, I might someday commit a portepoch increase > for these ports. :-) > > Any objections which are more important then repeating emails? > > Regards, > Ronald. > > > > > *Van:* [email protected] > *Datum:* woensdag, 30 april 2025 14:56 > *Aan:* [email protected] > *CC:* [email protected], [email protected] > *Onderwerp:* Ports with version numbers going backwards: devel/py-wheel, > math/parmetis > > ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous > one ** > > For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that > version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time. > Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Conventions' for > more information. Tools that won't work include pkg_version, portupgrade > and portaudit. A common error is an accidental deletion of PORTEPOCH. > > Please fix any errors as soon as possible. > > The ports tree was updated at Wed Apr 30 2025 12:30:00 UTC. > > - *devel/py-wheel* <[email protected]>: py311-wheel-0.45.1 < > py311-wheel-0.46.0 > > - *math/parmetis* <[email protected]>: ParMetis-4.0.3.p10 < > ParMetis-4.0.3_8 > > > > ------------------------------ > > > >
