Rereading your mail I saw some more concerns you mention.

1. When developing your port for main it can be easier to install dependencies 
for main also. That gives consistency to what is upstream.
2. As long as the maintainer of maven39 does not merge the changes to the 
quarterly branch, you don't need to do anything for quarterly. But keep the 
4.38 tag unchanged in github.
3. Your https://github.com/NorbertXYZ/eclipse repo has a nice README.md, maybe 
add something similar to the eclipse-maven repo with instructions to your 
future self on how you did things. 😀 I totally recognize going back to some 
project years later and wondering how things worked.

If you get stuck, there are probably some people here or on java@ that want to 
help further.

NB: it can really help to keep ports@ in the cc:, if you want feedback from 
others too.

Regards,
Ronald.


Van: Norbert Grundmann <[email protected]>
Datum: vrijdag, 13 maart 2026 13:37
Aan: Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Re: Question for java/eclipse build

Thanks a lot :-) :-) I will see...
On 3/13/26 13:35, Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi,

cc-ing ports@ back into the conversation
Van: Norbert Grundmann <[email protected]>
Datum: vrijdag, 13 maart 2026 12:46
Aan: Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: Re: Question for java/eclipse build

On 3/13/26 08:51, Ronald Klop wrote:
> The java/eclipse/Makefile has this comment:
>
> # The github repositories.  The repository under NorbertXYZ is for a > 
predefined maven
> # download, so the build does not need to download while do-build is > running
>
> I think the port needs an updated NorbertXYZ.
>
> Regards,
> Ronald

Thank you - that is the reason...  I can see this in freshports on the 
internet...

But how to handle this?  So I have jails to test my eclipse on aarch64 and amd64.  It runs 
14-RELEASE-p9 and uses preinstalled quaterly packages - that means also the "older" 
maven39 port.  My question is: if I would install the newest packages from latest - would it fix 
the problem?  But what happens with poudiere runs for the quaterly packages.  They would need 
"older" maven39, or?  and if I use software, I install packages from quaterly.  I am a 
bit confused about how to proceed...

All the best, Norbert :-)

--
I love penguins at the south pole, windows in my house and apples on my tree, 
but not in my computer :)




Your GH_TUPLE line defines a specific tag to use, which is now the same as 
DISTVERSION (4.38).
NorbertXYZ:eclipse-maven:${DISTVERSION}:n

A possible solution is to create a new tag in github (4.38_2) and use that in 
the main port and leave the quarterly port unchanged.
NorbertXYZ:eclipse-maven:${DISTVERSION}_2:n
See: https://github.com/NorbertXYZ/eclipse-maven/tags

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Ronald.
>
--
I love penguins at the south pole, windows in my house and apples on my tree, 
but not in my computer :)

Reply via email to