Am Tage des Herren Sun, 5 Jul 2026 05:10:11 -0700 David Wolfskill <[email protected]> schrieb:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 11:59:27PM +0000, Einar Bjarni Halldórsson wrote: > > On 7/3/26 11:47 PM, Jordan M wrote: > > ... > > > Can we get databases/lmdb reverted to 0.93.5, and 1.0.0 added as a > > > separate origin? > > > > > > > I agree with this. Upgrading lmdb broke both knot3 and bind920 for me. I've > > fixed it by downgrading lmdb in a ports-overlay tree that poudriere uses. > > > > .einar > > For my use cases, the update to lmdb affected mail/mutt and dns/bind920. I had some issues after the upgrade to lmdb 1.0.0, but all resolved after recompiling theport recusively, especially bind920. After that, everything worked as expected. Same with poudriere. I didn't see any miscompilation due to lmdb 1.0.0 - in my use cases and restricteted set of ports compiled via poudriere! Reverting to 0.93.X made the whole process going backwards and really messy! Wasn't necessary, I presume. > > However -- in my use cases -- neither was broken. > > I suspect that for mutt, the use is for ephemeral caches. (And in any > case, there was an update to mutt within the last 24 hours.) And for > bind920, I do not happen to make use of features that actually use lmdb. > (Thanks for the "heads up," though, so I spent a few minutes scanning for > the existence of any possible lmdb files ... and then updated rather > more cautiously than ususal, with a few extra checking steps along the > way.) > > Peace, > david -- A FreeBSD user
pgpG5nFoSpXEf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
