On Tue 2005.08.09 at 21:47 +0200, Alexandre Anriot wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:21:06PM -0400, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > this at least fixes honeyd for me. it may also work with phython/2.4
> > but i haven't tried yet - i kinda think python should be a flavor
> > though. if anyone agrees, i'll send one in.
> >
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/honeyd/Makefile,v
> > retrieving revision 1.9
> > diff -u -r1.9 Makefile
> > --- Makefile 23 Jul 2005 14:24:52 -0000 1.9
> > +++ Makefile 9 Aug 2005 18:52:13 -0000
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >
> > COMMENT= "utility to create virtual hosts on a network"
> > DISTNAME= honeyd-1.0
> > +PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p0
> > CATEGORIES= net
> > MASTER_SITES= http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/honeyd/ \
> > http://niels.xtdnet.nl/honeyd/
> > @@ -20,7 +21,7 @@
> > USE_LIBTOOL= Yes
> >
> > LIB_DEPENDS= dnet.1::net/libdnet \
> > - python2.3.0.0::lang/python/2.3
> > + ::lang/python/2.3
>
> I think that it's a bad idea to remove the version here. What is your
> problem exactly? I've no problem on several machines running -current.
ah yes. so if you don't have python2.4.1 installed, honeyd dependencies
work out fine, otherwise i get:
Dependencies for honeyd-1.0 resolve to: python-2.4.1, rrdtool-1.0.49,
libdnet-1.10
Can't install honeyd-1.0: lib not found python2.3.0.0
this is on -current. removing python2.4.1 and letting pkg_add(1) install
python2.3.1 works.
> A flavour or even a subpackage for the webserver could be a good idea,
> yes.. For example for people who want to use another frontend.
ok, will look into that.
