the header file has size_t and that seems to make more sense.
no bump in pkgname since there is no change except for on 64-bit
architectures where it didn't built in the first place.
comments?
Index: patches/patch-crypto_c
===================================================================
RCS file: patches/patch-crypto_c
diff -N patches/patch-crypto_c
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ patches/patch-crypto_c 8 Sep 2005 00:24:03 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+$OpenBSD$
+--- crypto.c.orig Wed Sep 7 18:22:23 2005
++++ crypto.c Wed Sep 7 18:22:58 2005
+@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
+ * bits.
+ */
+
+-void md4lite(char *message, unsigned int len)
++void md4lite(char *message, size_t len)
+ {
+
+ #ifndef HAVE_MD4
+@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void md4lite(char *message, unsigned int
+ * bits.
+ */
+
+-void md5lite(char *message, unsigned int len)
++void md5lite(char *message, size_t len)
+ {
+
+ #ifndef HAVE_MD5
+@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ void md5lite(char *message, unsigned int
+ * into 64 bits.
+ */
+
+-void rmd160lite(char *message, unsigned int len)
++void rmd160lite(char *message, size_t len)
+ {
+
+ #ifndef HAVE_RMD160
+@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ void rmd160lite(char *message, unsigned
+ * into 64 bits.
+ */
+
+-void sha1lite(char *message, unsigned int len)
++void sha1lite(char *message, size_t len)
+ {
+
+ #ifndef HAVE_SHA1
