On 17/10/05, Marcus Glocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Chris, List,
>
> Thanks for pointing out the problem. Your patch is not exactly right,
> as you are passing now 2 times the signal value to draw_signal. But we
> need the speed (speed) and signal strength (r) to calculate the bar.
> The problem is if we can't catch the speed for a moment, the speed
> pointer contains NULL, and if NULL is passed to atoi(3) it cores.
>
> I fixed it now in version 0.2. Attached the new port.
OK, this time it doesn't core.
All the "LEDs" are dark on an unconfigured iwi. That's what I'd expect.
Ifconfig'ing iwi0 up, there seems to be a discrepancy between what
ifconfig says the signal strength is "100dBm" and what wmwlmon says it
is "88dB". I'm about 8ft away from the AP, and traffic is flowing
across it.
iwi0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
lladdr 00:12:f0:c4:56:97
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect (DS1)
status: active
ieee80211: nwid linksys chan 6 bssid 00:06:25:61:1d:ea 100dBm
inet6 fe80::212:f0ff:fec4:5697%iwi0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
inet 10.0.0.66 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
No errors in dmesg from the card locking up though. I'm definately
looking forward to getting rid of the iwi in favor of an ath...
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
