On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:12:30 +0100
steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:58:27PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > here's an update for news/p5-News-Article. This diff does the following, it
> > - updates the port to version 1.27;
> > - makes me maitainer;
> > - adds the license;
> > - adds PKG_ARCH;
> > - re-orders the Makefile.
> > 
> > Index: Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/news/p5-News-Article/Makefile,v
> > retrieving revision 1.10
> > diff -u -r1.10 Makefile
> > --- Makefile        2005/09/23 19:41:44     1.10
> > +++ Makefile        2005/12/06 18:06:13
> > @@ -2,19 +2,25 @@
> >  
> >  COMMENT=   "perl module for accessing NNTP articles"
> >  
> > -DISTNAME=  News-Article-1.13
> > +DISTNAME=  News-Article-1.27
> >  PKGNAME=   p5-${DISTNAME}
> >  CATEGORIES=        news perl5
> > -MASTER_SITES=      ${MASTER_SITE_PERL_CPAN:=News/}
> >  
> > -RUN_DEPENDS=       :p5-PGP-Sign-*:security/p5-PGP-Sign
> > -BUILD_DEPENDS=     ${RUN_DEPENDS}
> > +MAINTAINER=        Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > +
> > +MASTER_SITES=      ${MASTER_SITE_PERL_CPAN:=News/}
> >  
> > +# Artistic/GPL
> >  PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=      Yes
> >  PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP=        Yes
> >  PERMIT_DISTFILES_CDROM=    Yes
> >  PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP=      Yes
> >  
> > +RUN_DEPENDS=       :p5-PGP-Sign-*:security/p5-PGP-Sign
> > +BUILD_DEPENDS=     ${RUN_DEPENDS}
> 
> have you used this and found that p5-PGP-Sign is really a dependency?
> in any case it does not look like it belongs in BUILD_DEPENDS.
> make regress runs fine without it, too.
The README file says:
"REQUIREMENTS

  This probably won't work except on Unix or a very good imitation.

  Net::Domain
  Net::NNTP
  PGP::Sign"

So I guess it's needed then :)

[...]
> 
> 
> 
> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
> 


-- 
"Security is decided by quality" -- Theo de Raadt

Attachment: pgpZUzD6WXJdd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to