Hello! On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:23:38PM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote: >hello,
>aanriot@ and I were wondering if anyone is still using ancient pgp >2.6.3, and whether it could be removed from the tree? >It makes sense to us since this code is very old and unmaintained, and >we have newer alternatives, like gnupg and pgp5. >thoughts/comments ? Do those newer alternatives, especially gnupg, replace *all* the functionality of pgp 2.6.3? Especially decrypting documents encrypted with pgp 2.6.3? Verifying pgp 2.6.3 signatures? For example I haven't got pgpverify for Usenet control messages to run with gpg. Unless it's clear that I can do all this with gnupg (of course with the idea plugin/flavor if needed), I'd not be fond of pgp 2.6.3 being removed. Kind regards, Hannah.
