Aleksander Piotrowski wrote:
Please don't commit it like that ... *sigh*
The damned snprintf() patches are still botched. An earlier fix missed
another instance of an identical problem. This is getting ridiculous... :(
Don't worry, we won't commit your update.
We will wait for new icecast version that includes these changes. I
see no point in replacing all those sprints/strcats/etc functions when
upstream authors don't want to incorporate those changes.
The other fixes in the update are kinda important, I would like to see
it committed eventually (maybe a consensus can be found after I got your
mail? ;P (see below)) after this is cleared up. I'm really curious about
your answer, so I can submit an acceptable update. :-)
ps. to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=3823, status=deferred (connect to
mx0.gmx.net[213.165.64.100]: server refused to talk to me: 554-{mx060} Your
address is listed as dynamic on SORBS (dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net) 554 We are
currently not accepting connections from such hosts. )
Grrr. :[
I asked them to stop that stupid filtering, apparently to no avail. The
@scapa.dnsalias.net stuff is my own MTA (also on a dynamic IP), which
works. My regular account on my MTA is maxx at kolabore dot ath dot cx,
which I hope to keep as spam-free as possible, you can use that, too. ;P
Moritz
