do u guys have any other chm viewer or u don't use chm files at all?
On 1/17/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 06:36:30PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 07:32:38PM -0600, edgar mortiz wrote: > > > I'll try to cvs the ports -current and see if i can build xchm as well > as > > > firefox 1.5 > > > > nonono. > > > > you don't want the whole -current ports tree on -stable. > > > > definitely do _not_ do that. > > > > read again what Joachim wrote. > > > > you _may_ have luck pulling _individual_ ports from -current, but > > this is not likely to work "out of the box", and you probably won't > > get much, if any, help doing that either. > > Yes, don't expect any help. > > And I wouldn't try Firefox - it's a bitch to build at the best of times, > and it requires lots of dependencies. Better to stick to what works. > > xchm might do it. I am running one -current package, dovecot, because > it has some features I really liked and I had faith in its stability. > Otherwise, stick to -stable. And don't try -current if you're not > willing to have some fun with glue after the thing falls apart yet > again. > > Joachim > >
