On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:15:48 +0200 steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Srebrenko Sehic [2006-04-15, 12:10:23]: > > I though I could remember something like this existed. However, few > > seem to use it since roughly 130 (31%) ports are outdated. > > > > People, let's bring those up to date. > > I think you are making this sound worse than it is. Often new versions > of perl modules are released to fix only very minor issues or even > non-issues. In those cases we generally don't update our port. So being > out of date does not necessarily mean in bad shape. Indeed, things like a typo in the README or comment, is quite often enough to release a new version.... If it's an important security fix, it has a bigger chance of being commited, of course. [...] > steven cheers, jasper > > Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm > -- Humppa is a serious thing!
pgpAyTF93cpgV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
