Bernd said: > Antoine Jacoutot [Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 02:37:29PM +0200] wrote: > >Selon Mike Belopuhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Below comes update to fvwm2 port to bring it up to 2.5.18. > > > >I did not try the diff but at first glance: > >- there's no need for a png flavor, it should be included by default > >- why did you remove Peter Valchev from maintainer? Did you contact him? > > > >Anyway, since this is a devel version, I think it should not replace > >the in-tree fvwm2 port but rather be a new port like x11/fvwm2-devel. > > > How about creating stable and snapshot dirs inside the x11/fvwm2 > directory instead of add a fvwm2-devel port dir? > > Peter?
This has been considered before and we came to the conclusion to simply stick to the -stable release. There is no reason to have every single development version of software inside the ports tree... unless there is a very good reason, but in the case of fvwm2, I don't really see it. A stable release will probably occur at some point soon, making these gymnastics useless.
