Hey Peter!

Thank's for searching for the issues in the port i'm using. I've updated it!

Here's the patch, w/o the $OpenBSD$ ``difficulties'' you encountered!
http://www.altroot.org/firefox.patch

Since some of your comments didn't make any sense at all, i answered the
ones i could understand.

> -# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.57 2006/10/01 22:23:47 brad Exp $
> +# $OpenBSD$
>
> Please leave this marker in from the original files, it makes diffing
> easier
Sure!
You can use -I '^(# )?\$OpenBSD[$:]' for now, to ``make diffing easier''.

> -COMMENT=     "redesign of Mozilla's browser component"
> +COMMENT=     "next generation release of the award-winning Firefox browser"
>
> Great comment!
Is that sarcastic?
The old comment is a bit incorrect for version 2. The first one was
redesign on Mozilla, this one is next release of the first one.
I don't see anything wrong here.

> +-pref("font.name.serif.tr", "Times");
> +-pref("font.name.sans-serif.tr", "Helvetica");
> +-pref("font.name.monospace.tr", "Courier");
> Hmm ?! ;-)
I've changed to normal fonts. Why not?
Change your font to Times. Does antialiasing work for you?

> firefox/patches/patch-db_mork_src_morkSink_cpp
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319004

> firefox/patches/patch-gfx_src_gtk_nsFontMetricsXft_cpp
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331077

> Why did you remove these patches?
Why didn't you do so when you were updating it?

And, sorry for the whitespace ``difficulties''! I just haven't thought
that was a big deal. (couldn't you use -w switch, instead of writing
sarcastic comments here about the things, which does not matter *AT ALL*).

I haven't updated the tarball, since nothing that matters changed.

Thanks for people who tested serious things.

--
Martynas Venckus

Reply via email to