On 2006/11/16 10:31, Soner Tari wrote: > Actually, in terms of licensing, I believe it is quite alright to add > DansGuardian among OpenBSD ports. On the bottom of the second link you > provide, one can read a FAQ as follows:
It's ok to distribute the package and original source code, and it's ok to have a port, but the port would have to fetch from an unofficial non- commercial mirror, to protect people building the port from possible trouble if it referenced the official site. I'm not saying this is a reason not to have it in ports, but the need for this (and the fact that it's against the author's wishes) may have put people off. > "So, if Debian puts DG on their website, they have to restrict downloads > to non commercial users, right? OpenBSD ports are generally setup to fetch the source file from the original site; that page doesn't address this situation.
