* Joachim Schipper wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:23:22PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Lars Olsson wrote: > > >with arj 3.14a that was able to open in OpenBSD. Conclusion: Remove > > >unarj from the ports tree because it doesn't work anyway. > > > > Can't it be updated? > > Even if it cannot be, arj is mostly a legacy format. If you agree with > this assertion, not being able to read the very latest version is not > that big a problem.
software like virus scanners should be able to decode it. it would thus be a plus if we can decode old and new arj files (for clamav, e.g.).
