On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 01:23:47AM +0100, Charlene Wendling wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:58:56 +0200 > Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > On Sat Aug 22, 2020 at 03:58:23PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > On Sat Aug 22, 2020 at 03:11:16PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:26:09PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > > > As mentioned here: > > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=159447072122157&w=2 > > > > > > > > > > Looks dead upstream and I ran into python2.7(93015) in free(): > > > > > use after free 0xd64017baf00. > > > > > > > > > > OK to remove? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > FWIW, gns3 is not dead upstream. They changed domain. Last > > > > release is only a couple of weeks old: > > > > > > > > https://www.gns3.com/community/blog/gns3-2-2-12-released > > > > > > > > But someone probably needs to start over to port that version... > > > > (I don't have enough interest in this). > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Matthieu for the note. > > > > > > Is anybody willing to update gns3? > > > > > Final call! I would otherwise mark it as BROKEN until someone wants to > > do the work. > > > > I was looking at the last Qt4 consumers and met that thread. > > I agree with marking it BROKEN unless someone is willing to do > something, once Qt4 is gone. > > As pointed out by Matthieu, one will have to start again and it would > require a least 2 new ports (see [0]) to get that update. > > [0] https://github.com/GNS3/gns3-server
Nobody spoke up, the port is still not marked as BROKEN and py-qt4 ought to be removed anyway, so I'm OK with removing emulators/gns3 completely until someone has enough interest to revive it (from the attic) with an up-to-date version using Qt5. OK kn
