Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] o+s > > +sbin/cgi-wrapper > > why did that change to setuid?
Note that setuid would be "u+s". The above mode is just nonsensical. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] o+s > > +sbin/cgi-wrapper > > why did that change to setuid?
Note that setuid would be "u+s". The above mode is just nonsensical. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]