net/argus-clients: fix for -fno-common

This removes an unused variable from the static library argus_common.a.
It clashes with one in the raconvert tool.  You could argue the latter
one should be renamed instead, but then again, the library variable
isn't referenced anywhere.

OK?

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/argus-clients/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.18 Makefile
--- Makefile    20 Mar 2020 16:44:25 -0000      1.18
+++ Makefile    23 Feb 2021 21:40:01 -0000
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 COMMENT =      utilities to read and parse Argus data
 
 DISTNAME =     argus-clients-3.0.8.2
-REVISION =     2
+REVISION =     3
 CATEGORIES =   net
 
 HOMEPAGE =     http://qosient.com/argus/
Index: patches/patch-common_argus_util_c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/argus-clients/patches/patch-common_argus_util_c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 patch-common_argus_util_c
--- patches/patch-common_argus_util_c   12 Aug 2016 21:39:14 -0000      1.5
+++ patches/patch-common_argus_util_c   23 Feb 2021 21:40:01 -0000
@@ -1,7 +1,19 @@
 $OpenBSD: patch-common_argus_util_c,v 1.5 2016/08/12 21:39:14 steven Exp $
---- common/argus_util.c.orig   Wed Jun  1 21:17:28 2016
-+++ common/argus_util.c        Fri Jun  3 19:23:33 2016
-@@ -22679,8 +22679,8 @@ ArgusLog (int priority, char *fmt, ...)
+
+First hunk: remove unused variable that clashes with one in raconvert
+
+Index: common/argus_util.c
+--- common/argus_util.c.orig
++++ common/argus_util.c
+@@ -6634,7 +6634,6 @@ ArgusGetIndicatorString (struct ArgusParserStruct *par
+ 
+ 
+ char argus_strbuf[MAXSTRLEN];
+-u_short ArgusThisProto;
+ 
+ void
+ ArgusPrintSourceID (struct ArgusParserStruct *parser, char *buf, struct 
ArgusRecordStruct *argus, int len)
+@@ -22679,8 +22678,8 @@ ArgusLog (int priority, char *fmt, ...)
              *tptr++ = buf[i];
           }
  

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          [email protected]

Reply via email to