On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 12:57:49PM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 09:02:47AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 01:15:57AM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > This is a dependency of the new net/dino 0.3.0 version.
> > > 
> > >   Information for inst:libnice-0.1.18
> > 
> > Did you miss attaching the tarball?
> 
> Yup...
> 
> > Also it used to be in ports: 
> > https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/net/libnice/
> > (in case you want to look at the history)
> 
> So we should remove the quirks entry.
> 
> The old 0.1.14 port had
>       SHARED_LIBS +=  nice    3.0     # 17.0
> and importing 0.1.18 with
>       SHARED_LIBS +=  nice    0.0     # 10.11.0
> seems wrong.
> 
> Should the port continue with 4.0 to avoid going backwards?

Yes.

> Here's a tarball that does enable introspection, gupnp and gstreamer,
> just like the old port did.

You sure it's the correct one?
This one explicitely disable introspection and does not contain any SHARED_LIBS.


> 
> > > 
> > >   Comment:
> > >   GLib ICE implementation
> > > 
> > >   Required by:
> > >   dino-0.3.0
> > > 
> > >   Description:
> > >   libnice is a library that implements the Interactive Connectivity 
> > > Establishment
> > >   (ICE) standard (RFC 5245 & RFC 8445)!
> > > 
> > >   It provides a GLib-based library, libnice, as well as GStreamer 
> > > elements to use
> > >   it.
> > > 
> > >   Maintainer: Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org>
> > > 
> > >   WWW: https://libnice.freedesktop.org
> > > 
> > > This first iteration of the libnice port is enough to build and run new
> > > dino, although I have not yet tested all (new) features with it in dino,
> > > e.g. conference calls.
> > > 
> > > We can always add more optional dependencies, features, etc. to libnice
> > > in-tree.
> > > 
> > > Run-tested on amd64 where `make test' reports
> > > 
> > >   Ok:                 34
> > >   Expected Fail:      0
> > >   Fail:               3
> > >   Unexpected Pass:    0
> > >   Skipped:            0
> > >   Timeout:            2
> > > 
> > > Feedback? OK?
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Antoine
> > 



-- 
Antoine

Reply via email to