On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 06:46:08PM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:40:12PM -0700, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/sparc64/2022-02-09/net/bro.log
> 
> > /tmp/sqlite3-1f089a.s:544060: Error: operation combines symbols in 
> > different segments
> > clang-13: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see 
> > invocation)
> 
> Usually we ditch ports-clang for this, but this port has this:
> 
>       # c++11
>       #COMPILER=              base-clang ports-gcc
>       # XXX src/modp_numtoa.c:174:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 
> 'DBL_DECIMAL_DIG'
>       COMPILER=               ports-clang
> 
> I suspect other non-clang arches fail similarly, so rather than marking it
> BROKEN-sparc64, how about limiting it to clang-arches?

OK but I don't think this needs a bump.


> 
> 
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/bro/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.83
> diff -u -p -r1.83 Makefile
> --- Makefile  26 Jan 2022 12:55:12 -0000      1.83
> +++ Makefile  18 Feb 2022 18:45:24 -0000
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ COMMENT=              network analysis and security 
>  
>  V=                   4.0.5
>  DISTNAME=            zeek-${V}
> +REVISION=            0
>  
>  SHARED_LIBS +=       binpac                    2.0
>  SHARED_LIBS +=  broccoli                  9.0
> @@ -39,6 +40,10 @@ MODULES=           lang/python
>  #COMPILER=           base-clang ports-gcc
>  # XXX src/modp_numtoa.c:174:30: error: use of undeclared identifier 
> 'DBL_DECIMAL_DIG'
>  COMPILER=            ports-clang
> +# XXX sparc64 and ports-clang don't go well together:
> +# /tmp/sqlite3-1f089a.s:544060: Error: operation combines symbols in 
> different segments
> +# clang-13: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see 
> invocation)
> +ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=              ${CLANG_ARCHS}
>  
>  MODPY_ADJ_FILES=     auxil/btest/btest \
>                       auxil/zeekctl/bin/stats-to-csv \
> 

-- 
Antoine

Reply via email to