On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 08:22:54PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Klemens Nanni: > > > Here's something I currently do to ports-framework changes I need on the > > machine I work on from actual port changes that ought to be committed. > > I use this on the bulk building machines: > > $ cat /etc/mk.conf > .if exists(/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/site.mk) > .include "/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/site.mk" > .endif > > I guess I could use -include. > > Anyway, that's simple enough. Do we need yet more magic in > bsd.port.mk?
Since I don't have any drawbacks at hand, mk.conf(5) seems to be the simpler place for now. I'll keep using that and report back in case there's any change in behaviour.
