Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2022/07/20 17:15, tux0r wrote: > > Stuart Henderson schrob am 20.07.2022 um 14:21: > > > > >The COMMENT assumes that one knows what ZPAQ is. It would be better if > > >it described what the software does, and leave "it is a fork of foo" to > > >DESCR. > > > > Makes sense. Attached is an updated archive. Having ZPAQ in the COMMENT > > still sounds reasonable to me, as it is a (relatively) well-known software > > and people might search for it directly. > > There's a size limit on COMMENT, see bsd.port.mk(5) for details. > I propose "journaling archiver for incremental backup, fork of ZPAQ" > which fits. (No need to send a new tar). > > With that change it's OK sthen@ to import
imported, thanks! (also, zapped an extra empty line in pkg/DESCR)
