On 2022/08/23 16:00, Klemens Nanni wrote: > OpenBSD only has identical /dev/bpf and /dev/bpf0, nothing in base uses > bpf0 anymore and bpf(4) is clonable, meaning you can open it up to > 1024(?) times. > > This should eventually allow us to remove bpf0.
What's the problem with /dev/bpf0? It doesn't really seem worth the churn in ports and breakage for user-compiled software that might still use this. It's not like the old days when we had a bunch of inodes for /dev/bpfXX.
