On 2022/12/13 12:35, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > https://docs.python.org/3.10/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-10-9-final > > Below is an update to Python 3.10.9. > > I've tested it on both amd64 and sparc64 > > (I left in REVISION-tkinter=0 for -stable purposes) > > ok?
Ah sorry I should have fixed the comment when I switched to 3.10 as default. Presumably 3.10.9 and 3.9.16 are targetted for 7.2-stable. So 7.1-stable has -rw-r--r-- 1 997 0 27973781 Oct 18 14:24 python-3.10.8.tgz -rw-r--r-- 1 997 0 20751663 Oct 18 14:24 python-3.9.15.tgz and 7.2-stable currently has -rw-r--r-- 1 997 0 33886015 Dec 12 02:57 python-3.10.8p0.tgz -rw-r--r-- 1 997 0 26948422 Dec 12 02:57 python-3.9.15p0.tgz The new versions don't need REVISION in 7.2-stable because the upstream versions are already higher than the existing 7.1-stable and 7.2-stable packages. However in -current, REVISION for all subpackages of both python-3.9 and python-3.10 needs to be higher than in 7.2-stable otherwise we'll have problems when 7.2 users update to -current or 7.3. So for 3.9.16/3.10.9 I would go with REVISION=0 in -current (which sets it for all subpackages in one go), and no REVISION or REVISION-anything for 7.2-stable. I've not yet tested build/run but not expecting problems there and there's nothing that concerns me in changelogs, other than REVISION it all LGTM. (I'll try to test, but not sure I will get to it this evening).
