On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:49:30AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2007, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > > Section #9 states:
> > > "We recommend you place the license in
> > > /usr/local/share/doc/<name>/."
> > >
> > > If you've already have a /usr/local/share/<name>/ directory for the
> > > application data files, as well as a /usr/local/share/<name>/doc/
> > > directory for misc stuff (as well as a man page and gnuinfo page),
> > > is there really any point in also creating the suggested directory
> > > just for the license?
> >
> > Why don't you just call the doc directory
> > /usr/local/share/doc/<name>/ instead of /usr/local/share/<name>/doc/?
>
> Good question. I wish it was that easy. The trouble is the the app looks
> to find its' own documentation relative to a base path.
Isn't that 'patchable'?
Joachim
--
TFMotD: mbuf (9) - Kernel memory management for networking protocols
