On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:21:29AM +0200, Vincent GROSS wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:06:03AM +0200, Vincent GROSS wrote:
>> > On 6/10/07, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >i've noticed the same problem when trying to port ICU. didn't look
>> > >further into it though. could you please keep me posted about this?
>> > >
>> > >i'll take care of importing your port when it's done.
>> >
>> > Ok, so ICU compiles nicely with -O3 and I managed to get the version
>> -O3? why would you want to use that?
> Because it was in the default compilation options, and once you add
> -fno-strict-aliasing to the CFLAGS, compilation, regression tests, 
> everything's
> smooth. Plus if I use icu4c for all my string manipulation needs, I'd like 
> it to
> be as fast as possible.
that's not how it works.
ports must honour CLAGS (which includes -O2 optimalization).

>> > to 0.0, but 2 tests are failing now. The errors seems to be related to
>> > version numbering, so I let it slip.
>> > There is still a helluva lot of warning about usage of strcpy and 
>> friends.
>> > It's only been tested on i386 so far.
>> > Also there is a dependance problem I didn't fix yet, about a binary 
>> using
>> > one of the libs being built. I'll be a bit busy in the days to come, so
>> > feel free to fix it.
> This does not prevent the package from being built, btw.
>
>> heh, same here. back on track wednesday eve though..
>>
>> > Please test and comment.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> cheers,
>> jasper
>>
>> > --
>> > Vincent GROSS
>> > "GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and
>> > impossible to accomplish complex actions." --Doug Gwyn (22/Jun/91 in
>> > comp.unix.wizards)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ``Sapere aude!''
>> NedBSD: http://nedbsd.eu
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Vincent GROSS
> "GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and
> impossible to accomplish complex actions." --Doug Gwyn (22/Jun/91 in
> comp.unix.wizards)
>
>

-- 
``Sapere aude!''
NedBSD: http://nedbsd.eu

Reply via email to