Caspar Schutijser <[email protected]> writes: > Hey, > > I'm doing a build right now to check the diff. But wouldn't it be > better to name it 0.9.0.20231108 instead of 0.9.1.20231108? Because > if they release 0.9.1, we'd need EPOCH to make that work, right? >
Please note that packages-spec(7) permits several extra suffix to avoid clashes with upstream versioning: - patchlevel: 0.9.0pl20231108 (< 0.9.1) - pre: 0.9.1pre20231108 (< 0.9.1) The full list in order is: rcN, alphaN, betaN, preN, [normal version], plN And the full doc is in packages-spec(7) man page as usual. -- Sebastien Marie
