On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 06:18:03AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/boost/Makefile,v
> diff -u -p -r1.140 Makefile
> --- Makefile  24 Dec 2023 00:26:12 -0000      1.140
> +++ Makefile  24 Dec 2023 04:57:15 -0000
> @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ COMMENT-md= machine-dependent libraries 
>  VERSION=     1.84.0
>  DISTNAME=    boost_${VERSION:S/./_/g}
>  PKGNAME=     boost-${VERSION}
> -REVISION=    0
> -EPOCH =              0
> +REVISION=    1
> +EPOCH=               0
>  CATEGORIES=  devel
>  SITES=               
> https://boostorg.jfrog.io/artifactory/main/release/${VERSION}/source/
>  EXTRACT_SUFX=        .tar.bz2
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ do-install:
>       ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/include/boost
>       ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/stage/lib/lib!(*.so) ${PREFIX}/lib
>       cd ${WRKSRC}/boost && \
> -             pax -rw -s ':^.*\.orig$$::' . ${PREFIX}/include/boost
> +             pax -rw -s ':^.*${PATCHORIG}$$::' . ${PREFIX}/include/boost
>       find ${PREFIX}/include/boost -type d -exec chmod ${DIRMODE} {} +
>       find ${PREFIX}/include/boost -type f -exec chmod ${SHAREMODE} {} +
>       # boost-build:
> @@ -159,11 +159,11 @@ do-install:
>               ${PREFIX}/bin
>       ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/b2
>       @cd ${WRKSRC}/tools/build/src && \
> -             pax -r -w -p pm -s ':^./engine.*$$::' -s ':^.*\.orig$$::' . \
> +             pax -r -w -p pm -s ':^./engine.*$$::' -s ':^.*${PATCHORIG}$$::' 
> . \
>               ${PREFIX}/share/b2
>       ${INSTALL_DATA_DIR} ${PREFIX}/share/examples/b2
>       @cd ${WRKSRC}/tools/build/example && \
> -             pax -r -w -p pm -s ':^.*\.orig$$::' . \
> +             pax -r -w -p pm -s ':^.*${PATCHORIG}$$::' . \
>               ${PREFIX}/share/examples/b2
>  
>  .include <bsd.port.mk>

Shouldn't those "${PATCHORIG}" be replaced by "\.orig\.port"? It isn't
an issue right now: "find $(make show=WRKSRC) -name '*?orig?port'"
only returns the files actually ending in ${PATCHORIG} and I guess that
if it actually becomes an issue in here, that also means that PATCHORIG
should have been changed before.

Reply via email to