I don't know, I told you, all I worked with are what you guys told me, what made sense and what I could found online I did not read code because I am not OS dev and don't have as much time as I would like, so this is the best I could do, Theo didn't tell me if I was wrong or right, he told me to make changes to source code and he is out.. does that mean I am right or to just read source code?
I maybe make no sense always, but neither do you guys I am as friendly as I can be, I said what I tried and didn't try, and who I am and who I am not - best regards, I hope we can make friendships regardless of out differences and knowledge, enemies are easy to make On Tue, January 30, 2024 4:08 pm, Bruce Jagid wrote: > If you actually thought you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn’t > feel the need to insert “I’m not an OS Dev” after everything you say > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:05 AM <beecdadd...@danwin1210.de> wrote: > > >> oh, Theo, if I were to start changing thing to the perfect OS security-wise, >> it wouldn't even look like OpenBSD code anymore, but OpenBSD still best >> what world have to offer >> >> so do you agree with my logic? at least give me that at least tell me is >> this how things stand FD-wise/limit-wise/whatever, you probably know the >> best out of all I e-mailed with >> >> no attempt yet,in future I hope,it's not a I am too lazy reason >> >> On Tue, January 30, 2024 3:58 pm, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> >>> beecdadd...@danwin1210.de wrote: >>> >>>> I know system shares all resources including FDs >>>> as far as I know there's what kernel/OS needs and is using and the rest >> of >>>> users including but not limited to staff and daemon users/programs like >>>> i2pd all I was wondering is the limit or amount of FDs and other >> resources >>>> the rest of users of daemon can use in my head is a total amount which >>>> apparently is unknown (I have been told why, but how can anyone work >> with >>>> that? it's like relying on someone mentally unstable) which is then >> devided, >>>> kernel/OS gets all that it needs, users and daemons get the rest which >> IS >> >>>> DIVIDED (in my head) until there is no more to >>>> divide/give away/share am I close? >>>> >>>> okay maybe not make all available resources to 1 program is not how it >>>> works but why not if that's the only programs that's running? I do not >>>> understand if it's even possible to do what I'm asking or questioning, >> I am >> >>>> not a OS dev because of reasons, but I like discussing such because I >> like >>>> OS-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> and just because what I ask isn't how it works doesn't mean it's bad? >>>> it could mean >>> >>> You've been provided with all the source code. >>> >>> >>> >>> Where is your attempt to change things? >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
