On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:00:07AM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:54:26AM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 02:48:32AM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote: > > > I wouldn't mind enabling it for all archs either. Not sure which arch it > > > doesn't work on so NOT_FOR_ARCHS doesn't seem very useful. > > > I guess if it works on 32 bit BE macppc there is a good chance that most > > > others work too. > > > > Remove ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and find out through bulks? > > Iff that's a bad idea or I'm missing something, your diff is certainly > > OK kn, given your tests. > > I think I'll do that then if no one sees a problem with it. > Does updating archs need a REVISION bump? I guess I'd do one > just to be sure.
It does not need a bupm. It does not change the package on architectures where it built and where it didn't build, well, it didn't build.
