> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:47:05 +0000 > From: Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> > > On 2024/02/20 14:53, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > This splits out the sun50i boards from the aarch64 package, updates > > the U-Boot version for those boards and includes the new crust SCP > > firmware in the image. The new sun50i package is provided as tgz > > file; the diff removes the relevant boards from the aarch64 package. > > PLIST will need these changes: > > -@pkgpath sysutils/u-boot-pinebook > -@pkgpath sysutils/u-boot,aarch64 > +@conflict u-boot-aarch64-<2021.10p9
Thanks! That means the install of u-boot-sun50i will fail untile u-boot-aarch64 has been updated to version 2021.10p9 isn't it? > DESCR probably wants slight tweaking, currently it has > "This package provides U-Boot for various boards using ARM processors." Ah yes, I'll tweak that. > > My idea is to import the sun50i (onhooked to the build) and then apply > > the diff. > > > > I probably need some help to make pkg_add -u do the right thing. For > > the previous diff that split things up, sthen@ told me to add some > > magic @pkgpath lines. > > If we want "pkg_add u-boot-aarch64" to still install of the various > aarch64 U-Boot packages, that can be done by adding this to > u-boot/aarch64 and bumping REVISION - > > RUN_DEPENDS= sysutils/u-boot/rk356x \ > sysutils/u-boot/rk3588 \ > sysutils/u-boot/sun50i > > Doing this would mean that release builders shouldn't need to change > their existing workflow, which is probably helpful. We stopped adding the pine64 u-boot onto the installation media. So this shouldn't be necessary. So it would merely be a convenience to users who have already installed u-boot-aarch64 but will now have to install u-boot-sun50i if the have a 64-bit Allwinner ARM board. I think I'm not going to bother unless someone convinces me to do otherwise. Thanks again, Mark
