Jonathan Schleifer <j...@nil.im> wrote: > Fixed upstream: > https://objfw.nil.im/info/262baf76e7e66bc4 > https://objfw.nil.im/info/d73a388ecaf73b2a > > New release: > https://objfw.nil.im/downloads/objfw-1.0.10.tar.gz > https://objfw.nil.im/downloads/objfw-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig > > Am 24.02.24 um 22:17 schrieb Mark Kettenis: > > > Ah, right. What happens in that case is that the branch will use > > register X16 or X17 and those are special in the sense that both "bti > > c" and "bti j" landing pads are ok. > > Ah. Is that OpenBSD specific or on every OS? I used "bti jc" upstream > now to be on the safe side. I think security-wise it shouldn't make > much of a difference since it's still before the function prologue?
Today: OpenBSD. In a few years, more and more software. In a decade, all operating systems.
