Evan Silberman <e...@jklol.net> wrote:
> Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> > No idea about nickel, but port-wise this this looks fine and builds.
> > 
> > Tests do not compile and thus don't run, though, is that a known issue?
> 
> I think it's because dev/test dependencies are only in Cargo.toml in the
> root of upstream's monorepo as workspace dependencies, e.g. for me just
> now the test build failed due to an undeclared crate `tempfile`, which
> is in the workspace dependencies but not declared as a dev-dependency by
> nickel-lang-cli. Since we're building from the published crate artifact
> and not a monorepo checkout we would have to resort to contrivances to
> get any test dependencies in place and build the test. So, the issue is
> known to us and probably is not a pressing issue for upstream. Seems
> like an edge case as to whether NO_TEST=Yes is appropriate.
> 
> Evan

Ping, reattaching unmodified since last week.

Evan

Attachment: nickel.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Reply via email to