On 2024/04/16 12:57, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:46:36PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I tried running some of the > > tcl/wish based examples; they fail on both 10.0.1 and 7.1.0. Since that's > > not a regression from the existing version I don't think it's a blocker > > so ok with me. > > Thanks for testing. > > I wonder if there's any worth in the TCL support? It's pretty niche, and no > one > has noticed that it is broken. Nothing depends upon it. > > Shall we kill TCL support perhaps?
I suggest committing the update as-is first then, if nobody jumps up to fix Tcl, disable the subpackage (easier than converting back to single-package, and easier to bring back if wanted later).
