On 2024/04/16 17:51, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024/04/16 08:44, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:39:16AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2024/04/13 11:36, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:25:19AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > > I've recently run into an occasional problem on my build machines
> > > > > where
> > > > > deps aren't getting installed and builds failing. The most recent one
> > > > > was with the new glib2 bootstrap method (to avoid the cyclic
> > > > > dependency)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if the previous times I ran into this also involved the
> > > > > glib2 bootstrap (I just cleaned and retried and they worked) but I
> > > > > think
> > > > > it may have been.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can workaround (clean locks and rebuild) of course, but zero idea
> > > > > of how to actually fix it.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm.
> > > > I've done numerous bulks since I introduced that bootstrap thingy and
> > > > never ran
> > > > into that error.
> > > > I don't know what this means:
> > > > Cannot replace glib2-2.80.0-bootstrap in glib2-2.80.0: just got
> > > > installed
> > >
> > > I wonder if things might be better with e.g. "glib2-bootstrap-2.80.0"
> > > instead ..
> >
> > Maybe... I still don't get this error.
> > Would you mind trying it?
> > I have very seldom free time theses days.
>
> I was thinking of something like this. I can try it in a few cycles of
> bulks after my current i386 (libc 100) build is done.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/glib2/Makefile,v
> diff -u -p -r1.389 Makefile
> --- Makefile 3 Apr 2024 06:30:13 -0000 1.389
> +++ Makefile 16 Apr 2024 16:48:36 -0000
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ FLAVOR?=
> # we don't want anyone to use this package directly
> PERMIT_PACKAGE= No
> CONFIGURE_ARGS += -Dintrospection=disabled
> +FULLPKGNAME= ${DISTNAME:S/glib/glib2-bootstrap/}
> .else
> BUILD_DEPENDS += devel/gobject-introspection
> PKGSPEC= glib2-*-!bootstrap
>
hmm no, scratch that idea
