14.11.2024 19:46, Kirill A. Korinsky пишет: > On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:00:40 +0100, > Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: >> >> That does make it sound a bit like it's ZeroSSL-only. How about adding >> a wiki link? >> >> Note that acme.sh uses ZeroSSL as the certificate authority by default. >> See https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/wiki/Server if you would >> like to use Let's Encrypt or another CA. >> >> With that or similar, OK sthen. >> > > Thanks for cleaner wording. An updated tgz.
HOMEPAGE is set by DIST_TUPLE already. One script has /bin/bash as shebang. Another makes our sh(1) and ksh(1) fail whereas bash(1) is happy. Upstream uses shellcheck(1) in their GitHub flows, you could add something similar in a do-test target, if you like. https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/blob/75b4bb306b7967dd480f70ef7e2d61947adabe98/.github/workflows/shellcheck.yml#L29 At a mininum, I'd syntax check all scripts we install; this seems like a good opportunity to find subtle differences between our sh(1) and others: do-test: find ${WRKSRC} -type f -name \*.sh -exec sh -n {} \;
