On Tue, 05 Aug 2025 14:00:54 +0200, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > with i386, after syncing the arch-specific USE_LLD parts from the recent > update in 8/11, I get quite a few of these during build, though it gets > past that stage. > > /usr/bin/ld.bfd: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '5', this reader only > handles version 2 information. >
I think that we can ignore it because it related only for debug information > eventually fails here: > > checking for cabs... /pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/xgcc > -B/pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/bin/ > -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/lib/ -isystem > /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/include -isystem > /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/sys-include -fno-checking -c -g -O2 -fpic > -fno-lto -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc g-sothco.adb -o g-sothco.o > /pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/xgcc -B/pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/ > -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/lib/ > -isystem /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/include -isystem > /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/sys-include -fno-checking -c -g -O2 -fpic > -fno-lto -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc g-socpol.adb -o g-socpol.o > yes > checking for cabsl... /pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/xgcc > -B/pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/bin/ > -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/lib/ -isystem > /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/include -isystem > /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/sys-include -fno-checking -c -g -O2 -fpic > -fno-lto -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc g-spogwa.adb -o g-spogwa.o > g-socket.adb:2882:26: error: value not in range of type "time_t" defined at > g-sothco.ads:47 > g-socket.adb:2882:26: error: static expression fails Constraint_Check > g-socket.adb:2884:26: error: value not in range of type "time_t" defined at > g-sothco.ads:47 > g-socket.adb:2884:26: error: static expression fails Constraint_Check > yes > checking for floorf... gmake[7]: *** [../gcc-interface/Makefile:294: > g-socket.o] Error 1 > gmake[7]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > yes > checking for floor... yes > > full log attached And this one rings a bell. Because when I updated patches I had touched things related to some time_t in ADA. Thanks, will digg into it. -- wbr, Kirill
