On Thu Nov 27, 2025 at 03:53:42PM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> To do what the comment suggests, otherwise you might end up with
> 2.45.1 binutils and 2.45 gas, for example.
>
> I did not run into problems, but carrying a local binutils diff
> across the .1 update made me notice that the dependency did not
> get dragged along.
>
> Thoughts?
Better than the current situation. If someone has forgotten to
update devel/gas with the same version, an error occurs, which is
a good quality gate.
OK rsadowski but please wait for maintianer feedback or timeout.
>
> diff --git a/devel/binutils/Makefile b/devel/binutils/Makefile
> index dee91052913..9f5bd2eff91 100644
> --- a/devel/binutils/Makefile
> +++ b/devel/binutils/Makefile
> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
> COMMENT = GNU binary utilities
>
> # keep version synchronized with devel/gas
> -DISTNAME = binutils-2.45.1
> +V = 2.45.1
> +DISTNAME = binutils-${V}
> +REVISION = 0
> EXTRACT_SUFX = .tar.bz2
>
> CATEGORIES = devel
> @@ -19,7 +21,7 @@ COMPILER_LANGS = c
> WANTLIB += c z zstd
>
> LIB_DEPENDS += archivers/zstd
> -RUN_DEPENDS += devel/gas>=2.45p1
> +RUN_DEPENDS += devel/gas>=${V}
>
> SITES = ${SITE_GNU:=binutils/}
>
>
