On Sat Dec 13, 2025 at 03:47:19PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > On Sat, 13 Dec 2025 15:32:17 +0100, > Rafael Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > > +Index: src/qdoc/cmake/QDocConfiguration.cmake > > +--- src/qdoc/cmake/QDocConfiguration.cmake.orig > > ++++ src/qdoc/cmake/QDocConfiguration.cmake > > +@@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ set(QDOC_MINIMUM_CLANG_VERSION "17") > > + > > + # List of explicitly supported Clang versions for QDoc > > + set(QDOC_SUPPORTED_CLANG_VERSIONS > > +- "21.1" "20.1" "19.1" "18.1" "17.0.6" > > ++ "19.1" "18.1" "17.0.6" > > + ) > > + > > > > Is it worth to keep only one 19.1 here? At least it will fail when clang is > increased and will protect from linking with wrong version on bulk bild. >
Yes we can do it but there is no longer a <19 (expect llvm16 but the list starts with 17), and if anything changes here, we will have to adjust the patch anyway.
