> They've been able to do that for a while .. I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. I wasn't able to find any recent solution to this issue in the ports mailing list archive. The only thing I could find was my old fix to 4.0 ports, but maybe I didn't craft the correct search, which is a possibility. > beyond little fixes where the work is already done like this, > the effort is better spent looking at Xf4vnc (server) and > ssvnc (vncviewer-plus-patches).
Agreed, but Xf4vnc is not built as a package, which is a barrier for some. TightVNC is a very familiar solution for many people.
