Landry Breuil wrote:
a flavor ? hell no :) though you can add alternatives in RUN_DEPENDS in www/tor-browser/Makefile.inc, which would be the right fit here, but left to the MAINTAINER's judgment. Landry
The www/tor-browser port manually inserts the path to the net/tor port binary into the browser profile at build time. This is why it would be necessary to create a flavor of this port if we want to give users the option to choose which routing software to use. Both are supported by the Tor Project. In the future, the C implementation of the Tor routing software will likely be deprecated in favor of the Rust implementation.
On the other hand, it would be beneficial to try porting oniux to OpenBSD. However, I think this will be difficult since oniux uses Linux kernel namespaces.
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/oniux I use both Arti and Oniux on Linux, and they work very well.
