On 2026/03/09 16:07, Lydia Sobot wrote: > I'm sure, but I'm more a little bit baffled coming from go-module(5) at > the whole rigmarole of adding the licence comments to crates.inc after > the fact (which seems to require parsing the existing crates.inc, > redirecting the output elsewhere, and then overwriting the file...?) > so I'd love a bit more insight into why it is so different since as much > as I dug at the docs, I couldn't find much of an explanation.
because nobody implemented that for go.port.mk yet it would be useful to have otherwise it's not really possibly to check for incompatible mixes of licenses that would mean it's not ok to provide packages
