On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:51:24PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 05:18:55PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:59:47PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > > Here's the diff that reverts the COMPILER addition in libnotify > > > consumers. It slightly decreases the amounts of deps needed to build > > > those ports, but as far as I'm concerned, these ports can stay as is > > > and I'd happily drop the diff. > > > Kurt, others: thoughts? > > I don't have strong feelings either way. base-gcc is generally a much > > quicker compiler than ports-gcc, so it could be a decent time saver > > on more complex ports. Theoretially reverting them will also give more > > ports that may still build on the other base-gcc arches that we don't > > build packages for. > I prefer reverting but I don't feel strongly about it. The now outdated > comments should be removed/fixed in any case. That's a good point. I hadn't thought about the comments. If we're going to do commits to remove the comment above COMPILER, I think we might as well revert the COMPILER change too. --Kurt
